Comments on NEPA documents can be sent during public comment periods to:  

U.S. Army Environmental Command
ATTN: Public Comments
2455 Reynolds Road, Mailstop 112
JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-7664

 or by email to usarmy.jbsa.imcom-aec.mbx.nepa@army.mil

NEPA documents for which the U.S. Army Environmental Command served as lead, are programmatic in nature or concern more than one Army installation may be found below. If you are looking for a NEPA document for a specific installation that you cannot find here, you will have to consult that installation's website. You can find links to most installation websites here: https://home.army.mil/imcom/index.php/garrisons

OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND REVIEW

USAEC currently has no NEPA document in the public review and comment stage.

RECORD OF PREVIOUS NEPA ACTIONS:

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements

Army Aviation

• Record of Decision for the Realignment, Growth and Stationing of Army Aviation Assets (Mar 2011) (352 kb)
• Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for the Realignment, Growth and Stationing of Army Aviation Assets (19.3 mb) 

Programmatic Environmental Assessments

Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle Fielding

• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle Fielding
• Finding of No Significant Impacts for Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle

Multi-Domain Task Force (MDTF) Stationing

• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Multi-Domain Task Force Stationing (PEA for MDTF)
• Finding of No Significant Impact for the Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Multi-Domain Task Force Stationing

Iron Dome Defense System - Army (IDDS-A)

• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for the Iron Dome Defense System - Army
• Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Iron Dome Defense System - Army

Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) Capability

• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for the Fielding of the M-SHORAD Capability
• Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
• Finding of No Practicable Alternative (FONPA)

Real Property Master Plans on IMCOM Garrisons

• Finding of No Significant Impact for Real Property Master Plans on Army Installation Management Command Garrisons
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Real Property Master Plans on Army Installation Management Command Garrisons (December 2019)
• Real Property Master Plan PEA Checklist (fillable)

Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) Conversion to an Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) and Stationing

• Finding of No Significant Impact for Converting and Stationing an Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) to an Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT)
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) Conversion to an Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) and Stationing (March 2018)

Solar Projects

• Finding of No Significant Impact for Construction and Operation of Solar Photovoltaic Renewable Energy Projects on Army Installations (Mar 2017)
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Construction and Operation of Solar Photovoltaic Renewable Energy Projects on Army Installations and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact (Nov 2016)
• Environmental Checklist for Solar Photovoltaic Project(s) for use by Army installations (2017)

Army 2020

• 2014 Supplemental PEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment
  • Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment Chapters 1-7 (9.8MB)
  • Finding of No Significant Impact for Army 2020 Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment Force Structure Realignment (including Annex - Summary of Public Comments and Army Responses) (1,026KB)
    
    Sections may be downloaded individually
     
  • Finding of No Significant Impact for Army 2020 Supplement Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Force Structure Realignment (without Annex) (575KB)
  • Annex to Final Finding of No Significant Impact for Army 2020 Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Force Structure Realignment (Summary of Public Comments and Army Responses) (478KB)
  • Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (June 2014) Chapters 1-4 (1.81 MB)
    [includes Table of Contents; Purpose, Need, and Scope; Description of the Proposed Action; Alternatives and Screening Criteria; Affected Environment and Environmental Affects]
  • SPEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (June 2014) Sections 4.1 - 4.10 (2.64 MB)
    [includes affected environment and environmental effects for Aberdeen Proving Ground, Fort Belvoir, Fort Benning, Fort Bliss, Fort Bragg, Fort Campbell, Fort Carson, Fort Drum, Fort Gordon, and Ford Hood]
  • SPEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (June 2014) Sections 4.11 - 4.20 (3.30 MB)
    [includes affected environment and environmental effects for Fort Huachuca, Fort Irwin, Fort Jackson, Fort Knox, Fort Leavenworth, Fort Lee, Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Meade, Fort Polk, and Fort Riley]
  • SPEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (June 2014) Sections 4.21 - 4.29 (2.51 MB)[includes affected environment and environmental effects for Fort Rucker, Fort Sill, Fort Stewart, Fort Wainwright, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, and U.S. Army Garrison Hawaii - Schofield Barracks and Fort Shafter]
  • SPEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (June 2014) Sections 4.30 - 4-32 & Chapters 5-7 (1.01 MB)
    [includes Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts, Conclusion, Cumulative Effects, Acronyms, List of Preparers and Contributors, and References]

• 2013 PEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment
  • Final Finding of No Significant Impact for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (Apr 2013) (1.25 MB)
  • Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (Jan 2013) Chapters 1-4 (2.28 MB)
  • PEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (Jan 2013) Sections 4.1 - 4.7 (4.25 MB)
  • PEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (Jan 2013) Sections 4.8 - 4.15 (6.54 MB)
  • PEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (Jan 2013) Sections 4.16 - 4.24 (4.38 MB)
  • PEA for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment (Jan 2013) Chapters 5-7 & Appendix A (1.30 MB)

Integrated Pest Management Program

• Final Finding of No Significant Impacts for Implementation of the Integrated Pest Management Program at U.S. Army Installation in the U.S.
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for the U.S. Army Integrated Pest Management Program

M1117 Armored Security Vehicle

• Final Finding of No Significant Impact for Using the M1117 Armored Security Vehicle (ASV) at Army Installations in the United States (Mar/Apr 2008)
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Using the M1117 Armored Security Vehicle (ASV) at Army Installations in the United States (Feb 2008)

Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicles

• Final Finding of No Significant Impact for Fielding and Use of MRAP Vehicles at Army Installations in the U.S. (Sep 2009)
• Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Fielding and Use of MRAP Vehicles at Army Installations in the U.S. (Sep 2009)
• Army Tank-Automotive Armaments Command Life Cycle Management Command Programmatic Environmental Assessment of the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Program

Net Zero

• Final Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) Implementation of Net Zero Program at Army Installations (Oct 2012)
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment Army Net Zero Installations (Jul 2012)

Range Modernization

• Final Finding of No Significant Impact for Modernizing and Operating Training Ranges on Previous or Existing Range Sites for Army Training Areas (Feb 2013)
• Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Modernizing and Operating Training Ranges on Previous or Existing Range Sites for Army Training Areas (Nov 2012)

Other NEPA Actions

Fort Irwin Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for Training and Public Land Withdrawal

• Fort Irwin EIS Virtual Meeting Room
• Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for Training and Public Land Withdrawal Extension, the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California (May 2021)
  • Appendices Part 1
  • Appendices Part 2
• Final Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for Training and Public Land Withdrawal Extension, the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California (March 2023)
  • Section 1 contains the Executive Summary, Section 1 Purpose and Need, Section 2 Proposed Actions and Alternatives; Section 3 Affected Environment; Section 4 Environmental Consequences/Mission Analysis; Section 5 Environmental Consequences/Withdrawal Extension Analysis; Section 6 Other Required Analyses; Section 7 Distribution List; Section 8 List of Preparers; and Section 9 References.
  • Section 2 contains Appendices 1A Public Engagement; 2A Military Vehicles; 2B Soldier’s Field Card; 2C Integrated Training Area Management Summary; and 3.3A Soil Types.
  • Section 3 This file contains Appendices 3.9A Operational Range Assessment; 4.1A Biological Opinion; 4.4A Programmatic Agreement; and 4.6A Weapons Noise
• Record of Decision Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for Training and Public Land Withdrawal Extension, the National Training Center at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California (February 2024)

Construction of a Military Housing Development for U.S. Army Garrison-Miami, Doral, Florida

• Draft Finding of No Practicable Alternative)
• Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impacts (June 2021)

Implementation of the Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan Update 2021-2025 for U.S. Army Special Operations Command South Headquarters, Homestead, Florida

• Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impacts
• Draft Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Update 2021-2025
• Press Release: Army invites public comments on INRMP and EA for SOCSOUTH

Construction of Gray Eagle Runway at Black Tower and Testing and Use of Lasers on the West Range, Fort Huachuca, Arizona

• Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment

Stryker Brigade Combat Team Stationing

• Final Environmental Impact Statement (Feb 2008)
• Record of Decision - Permanent Stationing of the 2/25th Stryker Brigade Combat Team (Apr 2008)
• Record of Decision - Conversion of an Armor Brigade Combat Team to a Stryker Brigade Combat Team at Fort Carson, Colorado (Jan 2014)

Makua Military Reservation

• Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision

Fort Huachuca, Arizona

• Draft Finding of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment for the Construction of an Ambulatory Care Center Replacement on Fort Huachuca, Arizona